Welcome

“Let us read, and let us dance;
these two amusements will never do any harm to the world.”

Wednesday, 15 September 2010

Good Reads

I made this: Unknown at 1:37 pm 0 comments
Just a very quick word to say 'hi' and 'thanks' to all those I'm linked with on GoodReads - while I've been a bit useless with the reviews, I'm really enjoying reading all of your thoughts!

So 'Hi!'

and

'Thanks for the bookie love!'

And I will be starting to do some reviews this weekend...after I fix the blog...and catch up on emails...and tidy up my twitter...

So yeah, first thing this weekend *ahem*

p.s. Happy Roald Dahl day (yesterday) and Agatha Christie's 120th (today) !!

Tuesday, 14 September 2010

Danielle Steelathon VIII - Fine Things pub. 1987

I made this: BookElf at 2:02 pm 0 comments
This is more like it. I liked this one, which was a bit of a weepy. Its the first 'modern' one I've really enjoyed as well, which is nice.

Bernie Fine is the manager of a large departmnet store in New York. He is sent to San Francisco to open a new store there. Although to him moving to San Fran is purgery, things look up for Bernie when he meets Liz and her daughter Jane, and falls hopelessly in love with both of them. And you know what, it was believeable! Complely saw them as a couple, and a family, and was chuffed. When Liz is diagnosed with cancer after the birth of their son, I was in bits about it. You care about Bernie and his family, and are there with them every step of the way. Yes, the meeting of a new love at the end of the book is slightly predicatable, but it was just so nice. And this book was also, in parts, funny.

One of the main 'comedy' characters is Bernie's mother. Bernie is Reformed Jewish, and like most of Steel's non-WASP characters it apparently doesn't count as racism if you attribute to characters only the stereotypes that you're "aloud" to take the piss out of. So Irish Catholics have loads of children, red hair, and are really warm hearted with a story to tell, and Jewish mothers worry, moan and nag their sons to marry good Jewish girls. This botherd me a little bit, but this was written in 1987, and the book is made better for the inclusion of some light-heartedness amongst the seemingly endless tragedy from about 200 pages in, no matter how distatesful to my PC-lovin' eyes.

So yeah, not bad, not half as good as her historical romances, but again, I could see the attraction in reading another of hers,

  Steelathon

Book 11 - A Good Woman

Book 10 - Lightning

Book 09 - Vanished

Book 08 - Fine Things

Book 07 - Five Days in Paris

Book 06 - No Greater Love
Book 05 - The Klone and I

Book 04 - Star

Book 03 - Heartbeat

Book 02 - Leap of Faith

Book 01 - Daddy

Monday, 13 September 2010

Danielle Steel VII - Five Days in Paris pub. 1995

I made this: BookElf at 7:49 pm 0 comments
ARRRG ALMOST UNSTOPPABLE BLINDING RAGE!!!!!!!!

Sorry for shouting, but this book made me soooo mad. I wouldn't mind if Steel was consistent in her hatred of anyone who wants to live their own life, but why is it perfectly acceptable for the hero of this book to leave his wife, dying father in law and three teenage sons when he realizes he is not living the life he wants, but for Sarah to do so in 'Daddy' is completely unacceptable, and she must be punished with the early death of her lover and the emotional abandonment by her children.

Peter is white/rich/middle class. He lives with her beautiful charming socialite wife and teenage sons, and works running his father-in-law's pharmaceutical company. The story opens with him taking a business trip to Paris to oversee the final tests of a cancer-therapy his company is producing before he takes it to the FDA, whatever that is. Like all her science based story lines, the drug is based on something that could make sense, but I don't really understand it, so it matters not to me that it doesn't.

Peter is a "good" person, he cares about his family, works hard and doesn't want to kill anyone for profit (like you're supposed to do), and so when he finds that the drug in development is "a killer" (why? we don't know, do we care? no!) it makes him re-evaluate his entire life. He cannot bring himself to tell his over bearing father-in-law, who also happens to be his boss. This leads to him thinking about how he found himself in this position. He married his wife after university, even though his small town dairy farmer family don't approve because she is rich and her father will treat him like a 'hired hand'. The amazing lifestyle and opportunities that marrying the only daughter of a pharmaceutical giant provides prove too tempting for him in the end. Fifteen years later finds him in Paris, where he realities he actually doesn't want this life, and doesn't want his wife and doesn't want his job and all he wants, all he really wants, is to be with this woman *who he has just met*.

Yes, once again, eyes cross across a crowded Ritz Hotel foyer and love blossoms *for not reason at all*. Except this time, there is a slight reason. The lucky beautiful fragile heroine is Olivia, the wife of senator Andy Thatcher. Her life is awful, married to a man she doesn't love, but trapped because of obligations to him and her political dynasty family. She also lost a son to cancer two years ago.

Olivia and Peter meet when a bomb threat to their hotel forces everyone outside, and they go for a coffee. They have one of 'those nights' where they learn everything about each other etc etc. She then decides to leave her husband and runs away to a village in the south of France. He follows her there, and they have a passionate three days together. This is "all they are aloud" because, you know they're married !!!!!!!!

This really really pissed me off. It doesn't matter how shitty your life is, or how little you love the person you re with, you don't shag about. No matter how big and beautiful her eyes are or how much she makes you want to throw your arms around her and protect her from all the bad things in the worlds, you do not shag about.. I know that sounds really evangelical Christian of me and everything, but would have really really belittled him to go back to America, dump his wife, sort out his affairs, explain the situation to his three teenage sons, and then shag about? No! It bloody wouldn't! This book condones adultery and for that reason I really really didn't enjoy it. The second half is predictable and they both "try to return to their lives", but their love for each other is so strong they cannot bare to be apart, and end up finding each other again anyway. Peter keeps the moral high ground throughout the book even though he was shagging someone else whilst still married by refusing to sell the "killer" drug on the market or defend its release to the FDA, and this someone makes him a god person, I suppose, but still he left his three teenage sons for a woman he fell in love with in one night, who just happened to have a slightly more tragic history than his, and listened to what he had to say and hit. This, to my mind, is not love, this is lust, combined with loneliness and a mid life crises.

Once again, this book made me feel cynical, unromantic and out of touch with my feelings, which I don't really like being, but thats why I don't read romantic fiction like this normally anymore. Never mind. ON to the next one.

  Steelathon

Book 11 - A Good Woman

Book 10 - Lightning

Book 09 - Vanished

Book 08 - Fine Things

Book 07 - Five Days in Paris

Book 06 - No Greater Love
Book 05 - The Klone and I

Book 04 - Star

Book 03 - Heartbeat

Book 02 - Leap of Faith

Book 01 - Daddy

Thursday, 9 September 2010

Danielle Steelathon VI - No Greater Love pub. 1992

I made this: BookElf at 2:57 pm 0 comments
This is more like it! Much like 'Star', this historical drama/romance was a pleasure to read. Again, because I liked the characters, and the plot was full of twists and turns that kept me guessing and my nose firmly attatched to the spine.

I don't know if its that the books being set 'in the past' somehow makes the typical aspirational romance more acceptable to my cynical modern feminist lefty "you don't just love for no reason, if you just fancy someone, that's lust" eyes, but I again really really enjoyed this book, even though it transcribes to the same ideals as the others (being single is awful and makes you some sort of freak etc etc).

The book opens with the introduction of the Winfield family: mum, dad, grown up daughter Edwina, her fiancee Charles and five randomly assorted children. The family from San Francisco (of course, no one comes from anywhere bur San Fran, NY or Hollywood in SteelWorld), where Daddy Winfield owns a newspaper, are travelling back from England on the Titanic. I don't want to ruin the book for you, but let's just say things don't work out that well in the end.

This book, apart from brilliantly exploring the sinking of the Titanic and the affect this had on teh people on board, and their families, also covers America's involevement in the First World War and the beginning of Hollywood expansion in the 1920s. Edwina, the heroine, 'sacrifices' her whole life (ie. doesn't marry or breed) to raise her brother's and sisters after loosing both her parents and her fiancee on the Titanic. The relationship between her siblings is lovely to read, again Stell does children very well, though I instantly wanted to kill her middle sister Alexis, the 'golden child' who later becomes a Hollywood starlette.

Issues I had with the book mainly are the ending, of course Edwina ends up riding off into the sunset with requisit Older Man (resulting in me suddenly looking at men in their 40s in a whole new light, I think she might be on to something her you know). Edwina was happy single, and it would have been really cool of Steel to make a break from the norm and show an Independent Woman who is happy, and doesn't have her lovers die on her or her family hate her. I also wish that we had seen a little more of the family newspaper, but then again the rest of the book appeared so well researched I didn't mind so much. The Titanic is such an iconic event in history, and as a Child Of the Nineties will always be an incredibly romantic setting (still sob at the though of Kate and Leo, even 13 years later. Was an even sadder child than am grown up)and I personally think with this book, Steel did justice to it. Either that or I was so bloody greatful to enjoy the book after the utter nonsense of the last one and was therefore blind to all its failings. Recommened, to the same who would enjoy 'Star'.

Only eight to go! Nearly half way there!

  Steelathon

Book 11 - A Good Woman

Book 10 - Lightning

Book 09 - Vanished

Book 08 - Fine Things

Book 07 - Five Days in Paris

Book 06 - No Greater Love
Book 05 - The Klone and I

Book 04 - Star

Book 03 - Heartbeat

Book 02 - Leap of Faith

Book 01 - Daddy

"Never a lender, nor a borrower be..."

I made this: Unknown at 1:17 pm 0 comments
Well no disrespect to Lord Polonius, or to Shakespeare, but some of the best books I've ever read were loaners!

Soooo, I just lent a dude I work with my copy of Northern Lights, the first in the 'His Dark Materials' series, by Philip Pullman.

And I'm stressing.

I really, really, really want him to enjoy it. More importantly, I want him to 'get' it.

I love lending books, but the majority of the time, it doesn't really bother me if a person hates it, likes it but less than I do, or make it their latest obsession. In passing the book on, I've done my duty. I've shared the love, paid it forward and all that.

Don't get me wrong, it's a fantastic feeling when you 'match' a book to a person and start off a whole new area of interest in them (it's happened to me like 4 times this year already, all thanks to @BookElfLeeds - Shardlake - CJ Sansom ; also the Daisy Dalrymple series - Carola Dunn, the Chronicles of Ancient Darkness - Michelle Paver and...dammit, I've forgotten the last set, but I'm sure you get the gist!). You have the satisfaction of having a new convert to chat with, and immense feel-good-i-ness (yes, I may have just made up that last word), and of course, having started the ball rolling,  more book lending can commence!

But I also recognise that we've all different, we all have different preferences, and what works for me might not for you, so, usually, I leave books as a subjective experience, and try not to take it too personally, whether positive or negative.

Except, very rarely, once in a blue moon, and when the clock strikes 13; you read one of THOSE books.
You know, the one that you can't put down, that makes you think, that you'll forever have a copy on your bookselves.
THOSE books are a lot harder for me to lend out. Because it really does matter to me that you get them, that you appreciate the wonder, language or world created.
And, in the case of Northern Lights - a book that was written as a direct contrast to Narnia, and the established literary world with reagrds to children and religion (though there was no need for the author to have a pop at CS Lewis, whose books still bring me joy and delight) - I feel that anything less than complete and utter adoration...well appreciation anyway, will not be sufficient!

Are you seeing where the stress comes into play?!?!

Right, I'm resolved. No matter what my work mates response, I'm going to stay cool. I will not use the word WRONG, or UNINFORMED, or TASTELESS (all have been thrown at me in the past and it hurts man...)I will not pluck the book out of his hands to show him what he missed, and I will NOT force the remaining books in the series on him.
I'm going to be a grown up about the whole thing.


Yup, I'm doomed
 

Leeds Book Club Copyright © 2010 Designed by Ipietoon Blogger Template Sponsored by Online Shop Vector by Artshare