Welcome

“Let us read, and let us dance;
these two amusements will never do any harm to the world.”

Friday, 21 October 2011

2009 - the year of the Kate - Part 1 - Morton

I made this: Unknown at 1:04 pm 0 comments
For the last few years; it hasn't been possible to step into a book store and not see a large poster with an enigmatic image of a garden printed on it, promoting some historical mystery or other.
The fault can be laid solely at the door one Australian author, who captured readers imaginations around the world in 2007 so successfully that ever since every publisher promoting female authors have aped her cover art (the same way that historic thrillers written from 2003 onwards have aped the Da Vinci Code...in both art and content...)!

Kate Morton didn't creep up on the reading world, she *EXPLODED* onto the scene! Every reader of note in my life recommended her works to me at some point or another. As a club; the original trio at LeedsBookClub sort of discovered Kate Morton's books together. We were late to the game - waiting in our usual way to pick up a copy second hand or from a library - which I'm delighted about as it meant the hype had faded somewhat. We went in with few expectations and were free to sink into the books without any preconceptions.

We rarely seemed to read the books at the same time - this having more to do with our entirely unrealistic and unmanageable 'must read' book piles than through any sense of reluctance!
I do remember that t'elf and I read them in their printed order, though I think the Silent Partner (the non-blogging member of the original LeedsBookClub trio) read the second one first, followed by the first.

Recently, the SP lent me the third Kate Morton book. We're going to have a proper session once I pass it over to t'elf, but I thought I would share my thoughts with y'all here. I'll update with the others thoughts at a later date!

*****HINTS OF SPOILERS*****
*****HINTS OF SPOILERS*****
*****HINTS OF SPOILERS*****

The House at Riverton 2007

Summer 1924
On the eve of a glittering society party, by the lake of a grand English country house, a young poet takes his life. The only witnesses, sisters Hannah and Emmeline Hartford, will never speak to each other again.


Winter 1999
Grace Bradley, ninety-eight, one time housemaid of Riverton Manor, is visited by a young director making a film about the poet's suicide. Ghosts awaken and old memories - long consigned to the dark reaches of Grace's mind - begin to sneak back through the cracks. A shocking secret threatens to emerge, something history has forgotten but Grace never could.
One of the best written upstairs/downstairs, now/then books I've ever read! This is an incredibly visual book - the word cinematic has been used by others - and I have to agree.
I'd just watched the heart-breaking, gut-wrenching Atonement and am not ashamed to admit that I used the visuals from that to inform my mental imagery - Keira Knightly as Hannah etc.
(PLEASE NOTE - Atonement is a fantastic book, but utterly incomparable with this one. I've seen a review that placed them side by side and just couldn't agree. Yes, both deal with similar incidents, during a similar time frame but are written with such differing styles as to occupy different sphere's of thought, for me anyway.)

I devoured this book - I'd have read it in one giant gulp if I hadn't had insignificant things like eating; sleeping and working to unnecessarily distract me. Although the denouncement is not as big a surprise as the build up would have suggested; I was sufficiently emotionally involved that I felt it keenly.
OK, the dialogue was in parts a tad clunky, but as debut's go, I found this to be an exciting introduction to a new talent.

AR - 9/10
BE - 9/10
SP - 7/10

The Forgotten Garden 2009

Cassandra is lost, alone and grieving. Her much loved grandmother, Nell, has just died and Cassandra, her life already shaken by a tragic accident ten years ago, feels like she has lost everything dear to her. But an unexpected and mysterious bequest from Nell turns Cassandra's life upside down and ends up challenging everything she thought she knew about herself and her family.


Inheriting a book of dark and intriguing fairy tales written by Eliza Makepeace - the Victorian authoress who disappeared mysteriously in the early twentieth century - Cassandra takes her courage in both hands to follow in the footsteps of Nell on a quest to find out the truth about their history, their family and their past; little knowing that in the process, she will also discover a new life for herself.

I'm afraid I was quite disappointed at this offering - which felt more like a copycat version of Kate Moton than a fresh offering by her. Perhaps it was a mistake to read one book directly after the other - I did have such high expectations going into it.  

Once again, the book is set primarily in England, though there are brief forays into Australia. Once again it moves between two time frames. Once again there are two primary protagonists - Nell in the past and Cassandra in the present. It borrows VERY heavily from the Secret Garden, without capturing the fresh winds of change that identify that work so powerfully. Dark and Gothic in places, these traits feel more like stereotypes of the genera than a continuation of the noble tradition of Jane Eyre. 

However, it is very readable. The language and imagery is as beautiful as I'd come to expect from Ms Morton. The dialogue is in fact much stronger than in it's predecessor. The romantic elements are not as tainted by tragedy, making them lighter and more believable in places. In fact, I think that the writing was improved upon; it was the plot - too similar to Riverton and more convoluted - that let me down. It also felt far too drawn out - ultimately the descriptions were wonderful but utterly let down by what felt like a much more slender plot.  

The SP totally disagrees with me here (though I think that BE and I are of one mind - I'll have to check). She was introduced to the author from this book and much prefers it to the House at Riverton. I think that with such similar books, whichever you discover first will be the one that you prefer (funny - just made me think of the Da Vinci code again. I was introduced to Dan Brown after Angels and Demons and have always preferred it to it's better selling sibling).  

AR - 6/10
BE - 7/10
SP - 8/10

The Distant Hours 2010
A lost letter arrives in the post and Edie Burchill finds herself on a journey to Milderhurst Castle, a great but mouldering old house, where the Blythe spinsters live and where her mother was billeted 50 years before as a 13 year old child during WWII. The elder Blythe sisters are twins and have spent most of their lives looking after the third and youngest sisters, Juniper, who hasn't been the same since her fiance jilted her in 1941.

Inside the decaying castle, Edie begins to unravel her mother's past. But there are other secrets hidden in the stones of Milderhurst and Edie is about to learn more than she expected. The truth of what happened in 'the distant hours' of the past has been waiting a long time for someone to find it.

My thought process while reading this book went something like this:
'Ok, time jumping - check. Female protagonists - check. She's found her style and she is sticking with it. Ohh, that's a bit dark and moody. Good, I like proper Gothic. How many new characters are going to be described down to the DNA strand?
Ooooo I think I know where this is going...wait...what's happened there? HOLY MOTHER OF...WHAT THE... ah no...oh that's so sad...NO WAY! *sob*...well that was just...WHAT?!? So she's wrong...OH MY SWEET SAINTS. so really...WWWWWWWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA'.
No really. Possibly a little less lucid, but that was pretty much it. 

The book is overlong. The descriptions - though beautiful - are overdone. There are too many characters, too many strands, too much build up, too many diverging story lines.
I LOVED IT.
Ms Morton has completely fixed her dialogue issue. Each character is distinct, both in actions and in speech. Unlike her second book (in my opinionation*) the huge build up is matched by the equally immense plotting.

The beauty is that you never really feel like the plot is convoluted until the end. It feels more like there are going to be loads of loose ends and then - well - let's just say it's a deeply emotionally satisfying and rewarding book. I heartily recommend and will be passing over to the Elf as soon as possible!

AR - 8/10
BE - /10
SP - 8/10


*Gratuituous Blossom reference

Christmas Read-A-Long - A Christmas Carol

I made this: Unknown at 12:01 am 0 comments


We at LeedsBookClub do like to set ourselves little challenges
every now and again.

This year, we very much hoped that you (that's right, YOU) would join us in our first ever -

CHRISTMAS READ-A-LONG

Out choice? The festive (and not excessively long) classic by Charles Dickens' - A Christmas Carol

A Christmas Carol Rough Guide
Stave One   - 21st October
Stave Two   - 4th November
Stave Three - 18th November
Stave Four  - 2nd December
Stave Five  - 16th December

Hopefully, if we get a bit of interest, we'd be able to meet up before Christmas for mince or apple pies and mulled wine. 

Or to watch the definitive version...
The Muppet's of course!!!





Fine the Project Gutenberg book here!!!

(I might just stick the book up here for direct download once I get a minute)

* * * * *
Christmas - Table of Contents




Tuesday, 18 October 2011

Book Club 8 - The Great Gatsby

I made this: Unknown at 8:10 pm 2 comments
Venue: Arcadia Bar
Date: 16th September 2011
Time: 5pm - 7pm


Discussed: The Great Gatsby - F. Scott Fitzgerald

Agreed on: Grace Williams Says It Loud - Emma Henderson

Wow.
What a fantastic meeting! This was one of those books where EVERYONE had something to say! In fact, it was the most animated, detailed and engrossing discussion we've had about a book so far! So much so that it's pretty difficult to write about - we jumped about, covering so many different themes, concepts, characters in the shortest space of time - there's only so much that I can write when we're all nattering like that!

Whether we loved it or hated it (and we seemed to do both!); no one at the meeting disputed that Gatsby was indeed a modern classic. A beautifully written book - the language was crisp and clear; at once descriptive and nuanced - especially in relation to the characters and their motivations. 

For those who had read it for the first time; the ending blindsided them! At least two book clubbers are very much looking forward to reading it again in a few years and seeing how being forewarned of the events affects their enjoyment. This only increased when they noted that a number of us who had read the book during our formative years (myself included) and weren't necessarily enthused about the prospect of re-reading it, found to our great surprise, we not only enjoyed it but two people actually took far more from it than expected! (Except for one person, who went from enjoying it to being relatively indifferent to it)

Despite being a relatively short book; the themes are epic in scope. In essence, this book is a detailed look at the 'American Dream' in action during the 1920's (and probably every moment since then), focusing very specifically on a particular social group - namely the obscenely wealthy. Very few of us liked any of the primary characters - finding them to be vacuous and shallow. We were unable to identify with them - even the protagonist and supposed everyman Nick. They occupied a world without consequences and subsequently one without genuine affection or consideration.

We additionally noted similarities between the Nick of this book and that of character from Hollinghurst's Line of Beauty. Both have left home and moved to a society that they believe to be superior purely because of the financial status of their new contemporaries.
One of the contrasts between the two was the differing ways each Nick regarded their 'sponsor' into that world of wealth and excess. Hollinghurst's Nick was perpetually grateful - indeed he fancied himself in love with his link person. Fitzgerald's Nick had nothing but contempt for Daisy - his cousin. He frequently betrayed his filial ties - most notably when he accompanied her husband and his mistress on a jaunt.

While breaking Nick down; we discovered that we did not in fact trust his perspective. On the one hand; we can only see that world through his eyes, however he is clearly not an impartial observer. Though he sells himself as true and honest; his language is frequently designed to manipulate the reader into regarding a person from a particular viewpoint. The way that he describes characters demonstrates exactly how he feels about them. This is demonstrably the case with regards to the women in the book - who are either disregarded, disdained or destroyed in his descriptions of them.
One of the best lines of the whole discussion

" Nick is telling us his honest opinion.
It doesn't mean that it isn't bollix"

We spent quite a bit of time attempting to identify the villain of the piece. For some of us; Tom was the obvious suspect. After all, he is cruel to both his wife and lover. He never regards Gatsby's affection for Daisy as a threat towards him and he was violent on more that one occasion. 
Daisy was also a contender. An indifferent mother; she is only ever seen through Nick's eyes - her motives are never clear to us. Does she ever actually love Gatsby? Does she love Tom? Is she stupid, weak and unaware, or devious, inconstant and calculating? What choices do we actually see her make?

Gatsby was one of the more favourably regarded characters. While we recognised that he was likely more in love with the idea of Daisy than the girl herself; we liked him despite that. He had worked hard to acquire his money (grant
ed not in the most honest of endeavors) and seemed outside of the group - perhaps even more than Nick who was clearly emotionally invested. We agreed that he lacked self awareness - he kept an open house but was never known by his guests and ultimately none of his fancy friends cared enough about him to even attend his funeral. We almost all of us felt that his fathers view of him instantly transformed him into a more sympathetic character. Both Daisy and Gatsby could be seen as archtypes - defined only by other people and idolised (Gatsby by Nick and Daisy by Gatsby) - one of the only traits they actually had in common.  

At this point we became briefly sidetracked. We had a sort of mini-chat about Of Mice and Men (John Steinbeck) and wondered whether that would have provided us with a better insight into the America of the time. Ultimately, we agreed that while it was a fascinating book; it was as focused on one niche group as Gatsby was. It would have provided no more or less an accurate viewpoint purely by being fixated on a less prosperous group of people. 


Then we segwayed into a discussion of the upcoming film of the book - starring such notables as Leonardo DiCaprio, Tobey McGuire, Carey Mulligan and Isla Fisher. To be released next year; I'm hopeful that we'll make it an LBC project and see it together!

At this point, I was fairly sure that the chat was about to diverge into more general reading topics, as it our wont, but nooooo. Next thing I know we're back on track! 

We briefly toyed with the idea that Tom wasn't the father of Daisy's child - that Gatsby had cuckoo-ed him. Then we disregarded it, fairly certain that Fitzgerald would have ensured that little nugget was explored in detail if it were the case.

One of the clubbers suggested that Tom and Daisy are in fact the perfect match. That neither of them were actually capable of loving another person; that the only love they could feel was for money. Together, they pooled huge resources, which would explain Tom's confidence and Daisy's inability to commit to Gatsby.

This naturally led to a bit of a discussion about the role of women during that time frame. Daisy - easily one of the wealthiest characters within the book - is powerless due to her gender. Her comment after the birth of her daughter 'I hope she's a fool' suggests that she is far more astute than Nick credits her. 

We followed that up by looking at the role of status within the novel. Even secondary and undeveloped characters are forced to compromise themselves to maintain or develop their status - most notably Jordan - who confesses to cheating - a move which totally alienates her from Nick. 

As we concluded we briefly looked at whether or not Nick could have been gay. Gatsby was the only character that ever felt real, 3 dimensional. Nick may have had a sweetheart back home, but he was certainly fixated with Gatsby. 

And then we were spent. Can you blame us?!?!

The Verdict
8.3/10

Next Book Choice
Grace Williams Says It Loud by Emma Henderson 

Suggestions


* * * * * 
Arcadia LBC


21 - Nov - Hard Times - Charles Dickens
20 - Oct - The New York Trilogy - Paul Auster GUEST - @CultureLEEDS
19 - Sep - The Hunger Games - Suzanne Collins GUEST - @CultureLEEDS
18 - Aug - The Princess Bride - William Goldman
17 - Jul - A Thousand Splendid Suns - Khaled Hosseini GUEST
16 - Jun - Cry the Beloved Country - Alan Paton
15 - May - 1984 - George Orwell GUEST - @CultureLEEDS
14 - Apr - BloodChild and Other Stories - Octavia Butler
13 - Mar - The Year of the Hare - Arto Paasilinna
12 - Feb - Heat Wave - Richard Castle
11 - Jan - The Miracle Life of Edgar Mint - Brady Udall
10 - Nov - Flowers for Algernon - Daniel Keyes


* * * * *
Book Club - Table of Contents

* * * * *

Thursday, 13 October 2011

Free Tickets to Lurve @ Morley Lit Fest

I made this: BookElf at 9:38 am 0 comments
THIS COMPETITION IS NOW CLOSED however, don't be disheartened, tickets for the event only cost six quid!

xxx

Very exciting.... we've managed to score a couple of free tickets to Morley Lit Fest Mills and Boon event on Saturday night!

This celebration of the romance genre (which you know I just lurve) is at a 1950s themed diner and includes readings, romantic crooning, comedy and bespoke cocktails.

If you would like the two free tickets, all you have to do is email me bookelfleeds (at) gmail (dot) com, with the subject 'I Got The Love!' (or something equally cheesy!)

First email in wins the tickets.... I'll stick a notice up to let you know when that happens!

GO ROMANCE LOVERS GO!!!!

Tuesday, 11 October 2011

Introduction to Poetry by Billy Collins

I made this: Unknown at 8:54 am 0 comments
Introduction to Poetry

I ask them to take a poem
and hold it up to the light
like a color slide


or press an ear against its hive.


I say drop a mouse into a poem
and watch him probe his way out,


or walk inside the poem's room
and feel the walls for a light switch.


I want them to waterski
across the surface of a poem
waving at the author's name on the shore.


But all they want to do
is tie the poem to a chair with rope
and torture a confession out of it.


They begin beating it with a hose
to find out what it really means.

Billy Collins

I discovered this amazing poem in Being Alive - the sequel to Staying Alive, both edited by Neil Astley. 

If Carlsburg did poetry anthologies, these would probably be them. Possibly the best poetry anthologies in the world.  




Table Of Contents - Poetry
 

Leeds Book Club Copyright © 2010 Designed by Ipietoon Blogger Template Sponsored by Online Shop Vector by Artshare